Sunday, August 02, 2026

(sad?) business story: US car industry

style and tricks vs value and engineering

How Just One Mistake Destroyed America's Car Industry - YouTube by METTLE

This video explores how a singular shift in business strategy led to the long-term decline of the American automotive industry. While the narrative often points to external factors like oil shocks or international competition, the video argues that Detroit's downfall was largely self-inflicted through a systemic reliance on high-margin trucks over traditional passenger cars.

Key takeaways:

  • The Era of Style (1950s): Detroit established dominance by focusing on annual model changes, chrome, and aesthetics (4:45-5:47). This created a culture where style superseded engineering innovation.
  • The Oil Shock Turning Point (1973): The 1973 oil embargo exposed the inefficiency of American vehicles (7:07-7:55) and opened the door for more fuel-efficient Japanese imports like Toyota and Honda.
  • The Rise of the Truck Strategy: The Jeep Cherokee XJ proved that consumers would buy trucks as family vehicles (12:27-13:05). This, combined with regulatory gaps—specifically the CAFE light truck fuel economy standards of 1976—incentivized Detroit to prioritize trucks over cars because they were subject to lighter regulations and yielded significantly higher profit margins (13:17-14:27).
  • The Cycle of Neglect: Because trucks became the primary source of profit, investment in passenger car research and development was systematically starved (16:42-17:35). Over decades, this led to aging platforms and a loss of competitiveness against foreign manufacturers that consistently updated their sedan lineups (18:00-18:55).
  • The Final Retreat: By the 2010s, after the financial crisis of 2008, companies like Ford and General Motors essentially abandoned the traditional sedan market in North America to focus entirely on trucks and SUVs (24:50-25:35), effectively surrendering their global market presence in the process.

How GM Sold America and became China Motors. Thanks for the Bailout, though (Part 1) - YouTube

story of how General Motors, WHILE BEING BAILED OUT BY AMERICAN TAXPAYERS, secretly closed a deal with SAIC; A deal whose price they and we are paying to this very day.


Saturday, August 01, 2026

GraphCon 2026, neuro-symbolic AI, RDF vs LPG, MD is new HTML

a chat with Gemini to explore this leading-edge AI-related concept.

 State of the Art in Neurosymbolic Land - by Kurt Cagle

takeaways from
GraphCon 2026 in Seattle, highlighting a quiet industry consensus: the tech stack is shifting toward neurosymbolic AI—fusing neural networks with deterministic knowledge graphs to solve the LLM grounding problem.




Key Points

  • The Grounding-Layer Consensus: Industry architectures now treat deterministic graphs as a mandatory foundation under LLMs rather than an open debate, moving neurosymbolics from research into real-world investment.

  • Markdown as the "New HTML": Documents encapsulating YAML metadata, code, and narrative prose are becoming the primary structure for information spaces, serving as human-readable context and direct entry points for LLMs.

  • Semantics & RDF vs. LPG: Graph architectures are converging toward W3C standards (ontologies, taxonomies, reification, and graph containment), pressing schema-less property graphs to adopt formal semantics.

  • MCP as the Control Plane: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is emerging as the control plane for agentic graph architectures, operating across a protocol communication layer and a underlying graph manipulation layer (e.g., SPARQL, SHACL validation).

  • Convergence on Holons: Multiple organizations are independently adopting "holons"—encapsulated knowledge graphs pairing a core knowledge graph with an evolving event graph.

  • Reification & Hypergraphs: Assertions about assertions (reification) make hypergraphs
    tractable and bridge human narrative language with structured machine reasoning.

  • Companion Piece: Fluents, Projections, and Observables


GraphCon — GraphGeeks


GraphGeeks is a global community for data enthusiasts, researchers, and professionals passionate about graph technology.


Pagila 4: Sample Posgress DB, port MySQL's Sakila

Issue #659: Three more things about Postgres 19 — Postgres Weekly

Pagila 4: A Sample Database for Postgres — Originally a port of MySQL's Sakila example database, Pagila has been extended to support numerous Postgres-specific functions (like SQL/JSON and UUIDv7) and v4.0 (which requires Postgres 18) is much larger with a more diverse dataset.

 devrimgunduz/pagila: PostgreSQL Sample Database


Housing + AI: Preapproved Building Plans

 Preapproved Building Plans Help Cities Improve Housing Affordability | The Pew Charitable Trusts

Drawings cleared in advance save time and costs for municipalities and builders


A preapproved building plan is a reusable set of architectural designs and blueprints that a local government agency has already vetted and cleared. Builders can use these plans for free or a nominal fee to bypass the lengthy, discretionary phases of the traditional preconstruction permitting process.

Key Findings & Benefits

  • Reduces Costs: Using preapproved plans saves developers an estimated 1% to 2% in total construction costs (about $5,000 to $10,000 on a $500,000 home) by reducing spending on architects and engineers.

  • Saves Time: It eliminates the case-by-case discretionary review board process, significantly shortening preconstruction timelines. In Seattle, for example, preapproved plans reduced approval times by a factor of 2.6.

  • Focuses on "Missing Middle" Housing: Most current programs focus on smaller structures like Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), single-family homes, and duplexes, though some cities include small multifamily units (up to 6 or 12 units).

  • Benefits Municipalities: Cities save staff review time and see improved land utilization through more infill development (building in existing neighborhoods using established infrastructure). It also lowers the barrier of entry for smaller, local developers.


Implementation Models

  1. Pattern Books (Catalogs): A published catalog of predesigned homes tailored to local architectural styles. Examples include South Bend, Indiana's "Build South Bend Toolkit" and Jackson, Michigan's "100 Homes Program."

  2. Self-Submitted / Reuse Plans: Programs that allow a developer to register a previously approved plan for expedited reuse on future projects, or a digital "library" of shared, pre-cleared designs (used in places like Hawaii County and California).

Note: While promising, the report notes that preapproved plans are a nascent policy tool (used by roughly 40 U.S. jurisdictions and mandated statewide for ADUs in California) and are most effective when paired with broader zoning reforms like eliminating parking mandates or reducing lot sizes.


the true, often overlooked bottleneck in solving the housing crisis is the slow and administrative permitting review process.

While AI cannot physically build homes or fix zoning laws, it can drastically accelerate housing production by rethinking and streamlining government workflows—catching application errors early, reducing review backlogs, and cutting approval times significantly (by up to 70%, as demonstrated in Honolulu). The goal is to completely reinvent how local governments operate rather than just digitizing a broken process.