Monday, June 29, 2026

AI biology workflows: Proto by Stanford

 A high-level programming language for generative biology with Proto | bioRxiv

Stanford University brings with Proto orchestration to AI biology workflows → Brian Hie’s team released Proto, an open framework for composing AI biology models across DNA, RNA, proteins and ligands into one pipeline.



AI summary 

The paper introduces Proto, a high-level, open-source programming language designed for generative biology. While traditional biological engineering relies on mixing and matching literal sequence parts from nature (often through trial-and-error), Proto establishes modularity at a functional and semantic level. It leverages generative AI models to bridge the gap between high-level functional intent and low-level biological sequences.


The Four Primitives

Proto unifies diverse biological AI models by breaking down design tasks into four core abstractions:

  • Sequences: Typed variables representing physical strings of DNA, RNA, proteins, or ligands.

  • Constraints: Scoring functions (ranging from basic stats like GC content to complex networks like AlphaFold) that evaluate a sequence's desirability.

  • Generators: Procedures that propose candidate sequences (such as language models or diffusion models).

  • Optimizers: Iterative loops (like MCMC or gradient descent) that guide the generator toward minimizing constraint scores.


Key Achievements & Validation

The authors demonstrate Proto's flexibility across multiple modalities and scales:

  • Recapitulating Past Campaigns: They successfully reproduced diverse literature designs in silico, including symmetric protein homo-oligomers, de novo protein monomers, multi-modal CRISPR-Cas systems, 20-kb chromatin accessibility tracks, and antibody CDR designs.

  • Experimental Validation:

    • RNA Introns: Designed alternatively spliced introns tailored to specific human cell lines, validated experimentally in cell cultures.

    • Promoter-Repressor Pairs: Achieved leading experimental success rates for synthetic protein-DNA design.

  • AI Agent Integration: By coupling Proto with general-purpose AI coding agents, they showed it can generate complex biological designs (like cancer-targeting therapies and multi-step pathways) directly from natural language instructions.

Ultimately, Proto aims to make generative biological design highly structured, scalable, and accessible to researchers across varying levels of computational expertise.

OpenAI custom "chip" Jalapeño

 OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom | TechCrunch

OpenAI unveiled its first custom-built inference processor, designed and manufactured in collaboration with Broadcom. Named Jalapeño, the new processor was designed specifically for the unique needs of OpenAI’s inference systems. OpenAI’s own AI models assisted in the development of the chip, the company said. While the chip is still being tested, OpenAI says early results show significantly better performance-per-watt than current state-of-the-art alternatives.

Net Zero vs. Passive House

 Net Zero vs. Passive House Clarified - EP #2 - YouTube @EkoBuilt Passive Homes


Designer builds efficient off-grid Passive House in Colorado - YouTube



Exploring Passive House Design - 90% Energy Savings! - YouTube
Undecided with Matt Ferrell

Numbers & Facts: Passive House vs Code-Built Homes - YouTube

This video from EkoBuilt Passive Homes compares code-built homes to passive houses, highlighting significant differences in insulation, efficiency, and cost.

Key Comparison Points:

  • Building Envelope & Insulation (R-Values): Passive houses utilize superior insulation to maintain a stable environment. While code-built homes often rely on standard fiberglass or rock wool, passive houses use materials like cellulose (which is 100% recycled/renewable and can be made fire/mold-proof with borate) to reach significantly higher R-values (0:56 - 5:51).
    • Walls: R-24 (code) vs. R-75 (passive)
    • Floors: R-10 (code) vs. R-40 (passive)
    • Windows/Doors: R-3 (code) vs. R-12 (passive)
    • Roofs: R-36 (code) vs. R-110 (passive)
  • Window Performance: Passive house windows are triple-glazed, thermal bridge protected, and engineered to maximize solar heat gain in winter (6:02 - 8:05).
  • Cost & Savings:
    • Incremental Build Cost: Building a passive house is roughly 5-10% more expensive initially due to the high-performance envelope (2:19).
    • Utility Savings: While the average Canadian utility bill is ~50/month** (with net metering) or $100/month without it (8:20 - 10:28).


Passive homes have gained significant recognition in recent years for their innovative and sustainable design principles. These houses are not just another architectural trend, but rather a response to the pressing need for energy-efficient and eco-friendly living spaces. With an emphasis on reducing energy consumption, passive houses have become a beacon of hope for mitigating the environmental impact of residential buildings.